Fox 32 SC vs. Rock Shox SID WC – Static Analysis

Fox 32 SC vs. Rock Shox SID WC – Static Analysis

29/11/2016
Whatsapp
29/11/2016

[ad3]

There’s great interest for a comparison between XC forks by the two biggest mountain bike suspensions makers: the Fox 32 Step-Cast and the RockShox SID WC. Both were completely redesigned and showcased in 2016.  They also have both gained the upper hand on XC race tracks, especially the Olympics, thanks to their light weight and most of all to their specs, which makes them the benchmarks for the 100mm segment.

F75R9032

We have tested them individually: here is the Fox 32 test and here is the SID WC test. Unfortunately we only had the Fox 27.5” model to test, but we’ve recently also gotten ahold of the 29’er to mount on our long term Focus Raven Max for a more precise comparison. The only difference between the two products is the length of the axle: the FOX 32 SC is Boost, so it has a 110mm axle, while the SID WC has the classic 100mm axle.

In this first article we’ll be making a static analysis.

Introduction

  • Both steerer tubes have been cut at approximately 20cm.
  • Weights have been measured with thru axle, hardware (hydraulic tube guides) and star nuts installed.
  • The SID, having a carbon steerer, is supplied with a specific star nut assembly.

F75R9048

Weights

Let’s start with what XC riders care the most about: weight. We have to say we declared an incorrect weight in the SID test initially.  Here are our final weights.

Fox 32 Step-Cast 29: 1380 grams
RockShox SID WC 29: 1550 grams.

Dimensions

While the height is the same, it is interesting to point out(as noticeable from the picture below) the difference in width of the two forks. Even though the FOX 32 is Boost, it is 1cm narrower than the SID if measured from leg to leg. This is achieved thanks to the Step-Cast, which are the indentations right above the dropouts; they create space for the disc and the spokes. The idea, according to Fox, is to increase stiffness using a smaller brace, and decrease weight using less material.

width

Both forks have a tapered steerer, 32mm diameter stanchions, and are set up for 160mm post-mount disc brakes. The SID WC has a carbon fiber crown and steerer, while those of the Fox are made of magnesium and aluminum respectively.

F75R9034

Both forks have bolt on thru axles with no quick release.

F75R9041

Settings

The SID has the following damping adjustments: beginning stroke rebound (the rest of the travel is regulated by the factory pre-set Rapid Recovery), low speed compression and lock/unlock, also from remote. The volume of the air chamber can be adjusted using the Bottomless Tokens.  By adding or removing volume reducers inside the air chamber, progressivity can be adjusted according to one’s preferences. The SID uses the Solo Air spring.

The blue lever of the Fox 32 allows the classic 3 adjustments: firm (lockout), medium and open. In the open position,  you can externally fine tune 22 clicks that regulate the compression at low speed. With the Fox, progressivity can also be customized by adding spacers inside the left stanchion after having removed the air pressure and the blue cap.

F75R9045

Both Fox and RockShox offer a handlebar remote to lock the fork.

Hydraulics

For the description of the hydraulics, check out the individual articles in which the topic has been explained in details.
Fox 32 SC
RockShox SID WC

Prices

The list prices are the following:

Fox 32 SC Factory: 1159 Euro
RockShox SID WC: 1255-1336 Euro

Stay tuned for the on-trail test!

Fox | Rock Shox

[ad34]

IMG_6108 IMG_6148

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of